Signs That You're In The Wrong Relationship
Clues That You're Ready to Start Dating Again
Your Online Date Could Be Scamming You For Money
Consider Writing Up a Cohabitation Agreement If You Move in With Someone
Confusing Things People Say When They're Dating
Want to Know What Men Think About Love?
Some Relationship Moves Can Backfire
How Does Match.com Match People Up?
Again, you fucks keep giving excuses that are only valid if the research gets to the stage of studying the SUB-elements and figuring out why and how they work.
BUT YOU NEED TO PROVE THERE IS SOMETHING TO BE STUDIED IN THE FIRST PLACE. THAT YOU GET ANY RESULTS ABOVE ZERO ON THE WHOLE LEVEL
These fucks always point to individual components, never the whole – BUT EVERY CULT has a percentage of truth in it, no cult is a 100% lie
- NLPers will for example go dig up a a study that shows that (for example) shows that eye-movement can be linked to mental states and go “AHA, there, NLP has been proven. This is evidence that NLP can make you richer, get you laid, and make you taller too” :D :D :D
Clarence tried that scam too by posting isolated studies about isolated components, most of which aren’t even unique to NLP. See the fucking bullshit they do? They take a system with 23423 elements and claims, and they believe that proving one element is the equivalent of proving the system works :D But NO successful scam on planet earth is a 100% lie, they all depend on having at least few true elements and half-truths. Proving that one element isn’t a lie does not prove that 100% of the elements are a non-lie :D That’s like saying people are only capable of either always lying or always telling the truth.
Clues That You're Ready to Start Dating Again
Your Online Date Could Be Scamming You For Money
Consider Writing Up a Cohabitation Agreement If You Move in With Someone
Confusing Things People Say When They're Dating
Want to Know What Men Think About Love?
Some Relationship Moves Can Backfire
How Does Match.com Match People Up?
Again, you fucks keep giving excuses that are only valid if the research gets to the stage of studying the SUB-elements and figuring out why and how they work.
BUT YOU NEED TO PROVE THERE IS SOMETHING TO BE STUDIED IN THE FIRST PLACE. THAT YOU GET ANY RESULTS ABOVE ZERO ON THE WHOLE LEVEL
These fucks always point to individual components, never the whole – BUT EVERY CULT has a percentage of truth in it, no cult is a 100% lie
- NLPers will for example go dig up a a study that shows that (for example) shows that eye-movement can be linked to mental states and go “AHA, there, NLP has been proven. This is evidence that NLP can make you richer, get you laid, and make you taller too” :D :D :D
Clarence tried that scam too by posting isolated studies about isolated components, most of which aren’t even unique to NLP. See the fucking bullshit they do? They take a system with 23423 elements and claims, and they believe that proving one element is the equivalent of proving the system works :D But NO successful scam on planet earth is a 100% lie, they all depend on having at least few true elements and half-truths. Proving that one element isn’t a lie does not prove that 100% of the elements are a non-lie :D That’s like saying people are only capable of either always lying or always telling the truth.